This is often relatively neglected because researchers typically prefer doing more research instead of promoting their existing output. By increasing the total number of EA and rationalist articles read, we’re increasing the impact of all of that content. Nonlinear is working on the third step of this pipeline: increasing the number of people engaging with the research. Research → Better conclusion → People learn about conclusion → People make better decisions → The world is better Barring some edge cases (1), if nobody reads your research, you usually won’t have any impact. Generally speaking, the theory of change of research is that you investigate an area, come to better conclusions, people read those conclusions, they make better decisions, all ultimately leading to a better world. Goal: increase the number of people who read EA researchĪ koan: if your research is high quality, but nobody reads it, does it have an impact? Or, just search for it in your preferred podcasting app. Listen here: Spotify, Google Podcasts, Pocket Casts, Apple, or elsewhere You can read it here or listen to the post in podcast form here. In the rest of this post, we’ll explain our reasoning for the audio library, why it’s useful, why it’s potentially high impact, its limitations, and our plans. We use text-to-speech software to create an automatically updating repository of audio content from the EA Forum, Alignment Forum, LessWrong, and other EA blogs. We are excited to announce the launch of The Nonlinear Library, which allows you to easily listen to top EA and rationalist content on your podcast player.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |